Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New features!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

123 submissions , 104 unreviewed
3,547 questions , 1,198 unanswered
4,552 answers , 19,366 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
411 active unimported users
More ...

How can Kaluza-Klein particles be told apart from winding modes at the LHC?

+ 4 like - 0 dislike
49 views

I`ve already asked this in the comments below this article http://profmattstrassler.com/articles-and-posts/some-speculative-theoretical-ideas-for-the-lhc/extra-dimensions/how-to-look-for-signs-of-extra-dimensions/ from Prof. Strassler but did not get a satisfactory answer...

In the article Prof. Strassler explains that a possible sign of extra dimensions at the LHC could be the detection of Kaluza-Klein particles. The energy (or mass squared) spectrum of the corresponding particle tower would have a step size proportional to 1/r (where r is the radius of a compact extra dimension).

Now I`m wondering how such a (hypothetical) KK particle candidate can be told apart from a winding mode particle (with the step size of the energy spectrum proportional to r) which is probably more easily produced depending on the size r of the extra dimension ? By the way what's the actual state of these searches for extra dimensions considering the data already available ?

Clarification

Considering an extra dimension that is much larger than the particle, the KK modes with the 1/r spectrum arise from the quantized angular momentum a particle can have due to it' movement in the extra dimension. If the extra dimension is smaller the particle can wind around the extra dimension leading to the winding mode particles. For these the energy spectrum is determined by the potential energy of stretching. The spectra of the KK and winding modes are T-dual to each other.

asked Jan 15, 2012 in Theoretical Physics by Dilaton (4,175 points) [ revision history ]
retagged Mar 25, 2014 by dimension10

1 Answer

+ 3 like - 0 dislike

By the way what's the actual state of these searches for extra dimensions considering the data already available ?

The LHC experiments are looking for extra dimensions in various channels (search for "extra dimensions LHC) and putting limits. At the moment the standard model reigns.

They are trying for KK s too, though still at a planning stage.

I do not know what a winding mode particle is, but I expect the decay products, which are the main thing measured at LHC experiments, will make the distinction possible.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-17 03:29 (UCT), posted by SE-user anna v
answered Jan 15, 2012 by anna v (1,710 points) [ no revision ]
Thanks @anna v. There seems to be something wrong with the first link; upon clicking it says "Collection Articles Not Found". Considering an extra dimension that is much larger than the particle, the heavier KK modes with the 1/r spectrum arise from the quantized angular momentum a particle can have in the extra dimension. If the extra dimension is smaller the particle can wind around the extra dimension leading to the winding mode particles (if they are not points ... ;-P). For these these the energy spectrum is determined by the potential stretching energy

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-17 03:29 (UCT), posted by SE-user Dilaton
which leads to step size to be proportional to r. The winding modes and the KKs are T-dual to each other. I`ve stolen this from Prof. Susskind's lectures :-). So I`m aking myself if the winding particles should start being more easy to get (if they exist) if there are strong limits for the size of the extra dimensions ...?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-17 03:29 (UCT), posted by SE-user Dilaton
But are winding modes particles necessarily? The first link is from a search of the CERN preprints. cdsweb.cern.ch/collection/Articles%20%26%20Preprints?ln=en asking for "extra dimensions LHC"

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-17 03:29 (UCT), posted by SE-user anna v
Now the link works :-). I`ve just found a picture of the spectra of the KK and the winding modes: web.me.com/kenmcelvain/StringTheory/StringTheory_C9_files/…. If I understand this right they both correspond to particles which are similar to but more massive than the known particles. The "extra mass" is due to the kinetic energy of the movement IN the extra dimensions for the KKs or due to the additional stretching potential energy for the winding modes which are wound AROUND, dependent on the size of the extra dimensions.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-17 03:29 (UCT), posted by SE-user Dilaton
@Dilaton makes sense to me. You could probably work that into an answer. (I've only vaguely heard of winding mode particles prior to this post, that's why I didn't post one myself.)

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-17 03:29 (UCT), posted by SE-user David Z
Thanks @David Zaslavsky, hm maybe I`ll try. Although I`m not quite sure if this would really answer my question. I just wanted to explain (to Anna) what I think I have understood from Lenny Susskind about the winding modes to clarify the question a bit. Maybe this edit was not too good and it earned me the retraction of the upvote :-/ ...?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-17 03:29 (UCT), posted by SE-user Dilaton
Could be. Or for all I know someone upvoted your question by accident, didn't realize within the first 5 minutes, and then couldn't undo it until you edited.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-17 03:29 (UCT), posted by SE-user David Z

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysi$\varnothing$sOverflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...