Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New features!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

123 submissions , 104 unreviewed
3,547 questions , 1,198 unanswered
4,552 answers , 19,366 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
411 active unimported users
More ...

Nonequilibrium themal QFT

+ 2 like - 0 dislike
37 views

Wick rotation to thermal of QFT in Minkowski space to thermal QFT, which is after this transformation analogue to statistical mechanics, does only describe equilibrium statistical mechanics. On page 227 of this paper it is said, that for dynamical questions beyond the equilibrium properties, the time coordinate has to be analytically continued to real Minkowski time.

This I do not understand at all. First of all, does analytic continuation not always generalize a real quantity to a complex quantity? This seems to go the other way round? Can somebody explain a bit why such an analytic continuation allows to describe the evolution of a system and how it works?

asked Aug 14, 2013 in Theoretical Physics by Dilaton (4,175 points) [ revision history ]
recategorized Apr 11, 2014 by dimension10
Note entirely sure I get your question. Does my answer on questions/71645 help (the time contour bit, not the bit about renormalization)?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-09 16:11 (UCT), posted by SE-user Michael Brown
Hi @MichaelBrown thanks very much, very nice post and it answers my stupid question here too, will have to carefully reread it :-).

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-09 16:11 (UCT), posted by SE-user Dilaton

2 Answers

+ 2 like - 0 dislike

The point is that dynamics is an initial value problem, that does not make sense in the analytically continued version. Thus analytic continuation is of no real help in nonequilibrium problems (while it is an efficient approach to studying equilibrium).

Dynamical questions in QFT are usually addressed through the Schwinger-Keldysh (or CTP = closed time path) formalism. They lead to Kadanoff-Baym equations, which are equations for the time-correlation functions.

answered Apr 12, 2014 by Arnold Neumaier (11,395 points) [ no revision ]
+ 1 like - 0 dislike

While I may certainly be missing the point, aren't the authors simply saying that if you start with an Euclidean theory, which describes a system at equilibrium, and want to analyze the actual dynamics, you need to analytically continue to the usual real Minkoski time (and then try to solve the problem)? Start from a system with “Euclidean time” wrapped around a torus with circumference T^-1, as they say, and unwrap it to "Minkoski time" to analyze a non-equilibrium dynamical problem.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-09 16:11 (UCT), posted by SE-user user88104
answered Aug 14, 2013 by user88104 (10 points) [ no revision ]

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$y$\varnothing$icsOverflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...