Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New features!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

123 submissions , 104 unreviewed
3,547 questions , 1,198 unanswered
4,552 answers , 19,366 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
411 active unimported users
More ...

On-shell action in asymptotically AdS space

+ 4 like - 0 dislike
30 views

Consider a field theory coupled with gravity described by the action:

$S=\int d^Dx \sqrt{-g} \left( \mathcal{R}-\Lambda+\mathcal{L}_m[\phi] \right)$,

with the requirement that g must be asymptotically AdS.

Usually in AdS/CFT correspondence the action evaluated on-shell reduces to a purely boundary term.

Is there a general formula to express this boundary term?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-07 13:46 (UCT), posted by SE-user Andrea Amoretti
asked Nov 1, 2013 in Theoretical Physics by Andrea Amoretti (50 points) [ no revision ]
If you're fixing the boundary to be AdS, then what is there left to vary at the boundary? Or are you asking if there is a way to express the above action as $\oint d^{D-1}x \sqrt{|g_{ind}|}(stuff) + \int d^{D}x\sqrt{-g}\mathcal{L}_{m}$?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-07 13:46 (UCT), posted by SE-user Jerry Schirmer
Yes, usually in holography you make an ansatz on the metric and on the fields and then you evaluate the action on the equations of motion. Typically the action reduces to a purely surface term, since the bulk term vanishes due to the equations of motion. I'm asking if there are general rule to express this boundary term without compute case by case the on shell action

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-07 13:46 (UCT), posted by SE-user Andrea Amoretti
This happens somewhat generically in general relativity, due to the diffeomorphism invariance, though the relativity community typically will discuss this in terms of constraints and evolution equations. Any good discussion on a 3+1 formalism will show that the Hilbert action is equivalent to a sum of constraints that are satisfied on the boundary of your spacetime evolution.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-07 13:46 (UCT), posted by SE-user Jerry Schirmer
Where could I find some material about this argument?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-07 13:46 (UCT), posted by SE-user Andrea Amoretti
See, amongst other places, "a relativist's tooklit" by Eric Poisson, or the original ADM paper, which is available on the arxiv.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-07 13:46 (UCT), posted by SE-user Jerry Schirmer

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysicsOv$\varnothing$rflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...