Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New features!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

123 submissions , 104 unreviewed
3,547 questions , 1,198 unanswered
4,552 answers , 19,366 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
411 active unimported users
More ...

"Light" states in critical $O(N)$ model in $2+1$ (and holography)

+ 5 like - 0 dislike
34 views

Let me split the question in a few parts,

  • Can someone give me a reference which explains the CFT properties of the critical $O(N)$ model in $2+1$? Like how are the CFT correlators (in a $1/N$ expansion?) and the central charge in that calculated?

  • I guess that by "light" operators one means operators with conformal dimensions smaller than the central charge. Can someone give me a reference which explains as to what are these light states that exist in the critical $O(N)$ model and in what sense are they like a free field? (..as I have often heard being said..)

    {..Are there other CFTs out there which have similar properties like the above and do for all of them the central charge grows with some $N$ (the same $N$ in whose large limit the system is having a lot of free-field like light states) ?...}

  • For any CFT is it true that if it doesn't have "too many" light states then it is probably holographic? (...by "too many" I think it is meant that the number of states (primaries?) with scaling dimensions below the central charge don't grow exponentially in the central charge - may be they can grow at most polynomially?..)

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-07 13:45 (UCT), posted by SE-user user6818
asked Nov 7, 2013 in Theoretical Physics by user6818 (955 points) [ no revision ]
For holography, it seems to be related to higher spin massless gauge fields in AdS4

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-07 13:45 (UCT), posted by SE-user Trimok
@Trimok You know of a good reference where the central charge and the anomalous dimensions of the critical $O(N)$ model is discussed?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-07 13:45 (UCT), posted by SE-user user6818
Sorry , no. I tried to find a reference on the Web, without success.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-07 13:45 (UCT), posted by SE-user Trimok
@Trimok I was wondering if one can at least say that at the large $N$ fixed point the central charge of the $O(N)$ model grows with N. Because large-N O(N) model is the same as the large-N spherical sigma model and hence if the former is critical then so is the later. And isn't it true that for a critical non-linear sigma model its central charge is given by the dimension of the target manifold? If that is true here we will get a $S^{N-1}$ and hence the central charge will grow as $N$?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-07 13:45 (UCT), posted by SE-user user6818
I suppose you are quite right. I found a interesting formula for the central charge (formula $4.2$ page $11$) of this paper

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-07 13:45 (UCT), posted by SE-user Trimok
@Trimok Thanks a lot! This looks interesting! Do let me know if you find a reference which proves this fact that the dimension of the target manifold gives the central charge of the critical non-linear sigma model.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-07 13:45 (UCT), posted by SE-user user6818
@Trimok How do they know this $c_{free} = D/(D-1)$?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-07 13:45 (UCT), posted by SE-user user6818

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysics$\varnothing$verflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...