Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

Please welcome our new moderators!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

122 submissions , 103 unreviewed
3,497 questions , 1,172 unanswered
4,545 answers , 19,342 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
408 active unimported users
More ...

Spekkens Toy Model, Internal Comonoids

+ 3 like - 0 dislike
5 views

I have been thinking about Spekkens Toy model in terms of interfaces. The Spekkens paper concerns a physics based on only being able to receive answers to half the number of questions necessary to specify the state of a system. This is something like having a limited interface to some kind of system. I take an apparatus as an internal category in a monoidal category and the apparatus is seen as some limited interface to an underlying quantum causal structure. Would it be possible to reformulate Spekkens' idea in terms of internal categories?

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
asked Nov 27, 2011 in Theoretical Physics by user442920 (90 points) [ no revision ]

1 Answer

+ 2 like - 0 dislike

The short answer is yes: these ideas can be formulated as internal algebras in a monoidal category. Take a look at http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.5005 for starters. Bill Edwards' PhD thesis has quite a bit more, and other papers by him and Bob Coecke may also be of interest.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
answered Dec 10, 2011 by Ross Duncan (20 points) [ no revision ]
Thanks Joe. I've been lurking since (before!) it started :-)

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
Welcome to the site, Ross!

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysic$\varnothing$Overflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...