Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New features!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

123 submissions , 104 unreviewed
3,547 questions , 1,198 unanswered
4,549 answers , 19,356 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
410 active unimported users
More ...

Calculating the dispersion relation of dirac lagrangian in curved spacetime

+ 2 like - 0 dislike
32 views

I am trying to calculate the dispersion relation for a fermion in a gravitational field. So far, I have computed the equation of motion, but I am stuck trying to figure out a determinant I just can't get.... I am having trouble calculating the final determinant.

My derivation is below:

Equation of motion:

\begin{equation} \left(i\gamma^a\partial_a - m -\frac{1}{2} \gamma^a\gamma^5B_a\right)\Psi = 0 \end{equation}

If we take $\Psi = u(\vec{p_a})e^{-ip_ax^a}$ as our ansatz we get the result \begin{align} \left(i\gamma^a(-ip_a) -m -\frac 12\gamma^a\gamma^5B_a \right)u(\vec{p_a}) &= 0 \\ \left(\gamma^ap_a -m -\frac 12\gamma^a\gamma^5B_a \right)u(\vec{p_a}) &= 0 \end{align} We multiply this by expression by $\left(\gamma^ap_a +m -\frac 12\gamma^a\gamma^5B_a \right)$ and expand to get \begin{equation} \bigg[\gamma^b\gamma^ap_ap_b -m^2 + m(\gamma^ap_a - \gamma^bp_b) - \frac{m}{2}(\gamma^b\gamma^5B_b-\gamma^a\gamma^5B_a) - \gamma^b\gamma^a\gamma^5B_aP_b ~~ - \notag \end{equation} \begin{equation} -~~ \gamma^a\gamma^5\gamma^bB_bP_a + \frac 14 \gamma^b\gamma^5\gamma^a\gamma^5B_aB_b\bigg]u(\vec{p}_a) = 0 \end{equation} \begin{equation} \bigg[p^ap_a -m^2 + \frac 12[\gamma^a,\gamma^b]\gamma^5B_aP_b - \frac 14B^aB_a\bigg]u(\vec{p}_a) = 0 \end{equation} This is a matrix times spinor equal to zero, meaning the determinant of the matrix must be zero (since the spinor being zero is of no interest to us). Therefore:

$$ \text{det}\bigg[(p^ap_a -m^2 - \frac 14B^aB_a){\mathcal{\large\mathbb{1}}}+ \frac 12[\gamma^a,\gamma^b]\gamma^5B_aP_b\bigg] = 0 $$

Anyone have any tips on calculating such a monster? Or even a different way of finding the relation?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-06 21:59 (UCT), posted by SE-user Nathan Moynihan
asked Dec 5, 2013 in Theoretical Physics by Nathan Moynihan (10 points) [ no revision ]
I think you may choose a frame where the spatial part of $p$ is zero (so only $p^0 $ is non-zero) and use the Weyl Basis. The interesting matrices $[\gamma^0, \gamma^i]\gamma^5$ are block-diagonal, so it is easy to find the determinant (Each block is a matrix $\lambda ~ \mathbb{Id} + \vec \mu . \vec \sigma$, with determinant $\lambda^2-\vec \mu^2$). Then, you have to express the final result in a Lorentz-invariant way, using $p^2, B^2, (p.B)^2$

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-06 21:59 (UCT), posted by SE-user Trimok

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysicsOver$\varnothing$low
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...