Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New features!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

123 submissions , 104 unreviewed
3,547 questions , 1,198 unanswered
4,549 answers , 19,356 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
410 active unimported users
More ...

Counting D0-D4 Bound States

+ 6 like - 0 dislike
22 views

I have a slightly technical combinatorics question. Consider the degeneracy $D_n$ of bound states of $n$ D0 branes and one D4 brane. This is given in Polchinski by (13.6.24),

\begin{align} \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}q^n D_n=2^8\prod_{k=1}^{\infty}\left(\frac{1+q^k}{1-q^k}\right)^{8}. \end{align}

I was able to verify this up to $n=3$, basically you have to count all ways to form bound states of the D0 branes and then bound them to the D4 brane. However, I wasn't able to verify it in general, since brute forcing it is a bit of a mess. Is there some clever mathematical formalism that allows one to deal with combinatorical problems like this?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-05 14:52 (UCT), posted by SE-user Matthew
asked Nov 21, 2013 in Theoretical Physics by Matthew (320 points) [ no revision ]

1 Answer

+ 5 like - 0 dislike

This formula is actually pretty simple to understand.

First, the $2^8$ is the number of possible $D4$ states. Then for each (indistinguishable) $D0$, they can be in either a fermionic or bosonic state, of which there are $8$ each.

Next, the coefficient of $q^n$ in $(1+q)^8$ is the number of ways for $n$ independent $D0$ branes to fit in $8$ fermionic states.

The coefficient of $q^n$ in $(1-q)^{-8}$ is the number of ways for $n$ independent $D0$ branes to fit in $8$ bosonic states.

We multiply these two to allow $D0$ branes to occupy either bosonic or fermionic states.

By taking the products over $q^k$, we allow $D0$ branes to first form $k$-tuply bound states which occupy a single $D0$ state.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-05 14:52 (UCT), posted by SE-user Ryan Thorngren
answered Nov 22, 2013 by Ryan Thorngren (1,405 points) [ no revision ]
Thanks @Ryan! This is very helpful. One minor correction: I think you meant (1-q)^(-8) for the bosonic counting instead of (1-q)^(8).

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-05 14:52 (UCT), posted by SE-user Matthew
Good catch! Yes I do.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-05 14:52 (UCT), posted by SE-user Ryan Thorngren

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysicsOverfl$\varnothing$w
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...