Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New features!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

123 submissions , 104 unreviewed
3,547 questions , 1,198 unanswered
4,552 answers , 19,366 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
411 active unimported users
More ...

Why does one of the extra dimensions of F-Theory have to be a temporal dimension?

+ 5 like - 0 dislike
74 views

F-Theory, as I understand it, is a realisation of Type IIB String Theory as a 12-dimensional theory in such a way that the $SL(2,\mathbb Z)$ symmetry becomes natural because Type IIB String Theory is F-Theory compactified on a torus.

Question 1: However, this explains only why F-Theory needs to be 12-dimensional. Why does one of these extra infinitesimal dimensions need to be temporal, though.

Question 2: I've also heard that F-Theory isn't exactly a 2-time theory. However, that doesn't make sense to me, as, since the metric signature needs to be $(-1,-1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1)$, i.e. mostly plus, with 2 temporals and 10 spatials. Or am I missing something obvious, here?

asked Aug 29, 2013 in Theoretical Physics by dimension10 (1,950 points) [ revision history ]
retagged May 21, 2014 by dimension10

1 Answer

+ 6 like - 0 dislike

You can't really assign "the only correct signature" to the two extra infinitesimal dimensions of F-theory, so the signature is 11+1. The uniform signature of both of these dimensions is also needed for the moduli space to be $SL(2,R)/SO(2,R)$. Note that $SO(2,R)$ in the denominator is only a symmetry if they have the same signature.

When treated as a compactification, we think of them as of being spacelike. On the other hand, when it comes to the reality and chirality of spinors in the would-be 12-dimensional theory, they mimic what you would expect from the signature 10+2. One couldn't have a 32-component real spinor in 11+1 dimensions (spinors are complex in that dimension).

Those things don't contradict each other because the dimensions are infinitesimal. The proper length of the dimensions is really $0=0i$, it is compatible with both signatures.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-03 18:21 (UCT), posted by SE-user Luboš Motl
answered Jan 30, 2014 by Luboš Motl (10,178 points) [ no revision ]
Thanks for the answer!

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-03 18:21 (UCT), posted by SE-user Dimensio1n0

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\varnothing$ysicsOverflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...