Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New features!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

123 submissions , 104 unreviewed
3,547 questions , 1,198 unanswered
4,549 answers , 19,356 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
410 active unimported users
More ...

Question threading on the main site?

+ 0 like - 0 dislike
82 views

In order to make a useful site, it is good to keep the different categories of questions well threaded by subject matter. A good guide is to start with the arxiv categories, so that a question comes with an arxiv category, and you can browse the questions in only one category.

If the question is about an existing paper, you can link to the paper and to the arxiv category, and then it will be automatic. But you can also sub-thread spin-off questions in a tree structure.

I think this is important, because the lack of question-threading on stackexchange means it only works for a short while before the content becomes unmanagable. Flat lists can't work once there are too many questions.

In order to do this, you need to have a different "category" system than a flat list, with categories including sub-categories, they are directories really, and each question sits in a given directory, so it belongs to one main category, but it has soft-links to other categories, so that it can appear in other sections, just as in arxiv. This requires only a little programming to implement, but I think it is critical, if the site is to be capable of unlimited growth.

(I am willing to manually classify all the questions to date by arxiv category, and by subthread, to start off the classification, it is a thankless job, but it doesn't take long, so long as you have a directory structure of the categories, with arxiv sections the main categories, and access to the questions)

asked Feb 21, 2014 in Feature Request by Ron Maimon (7,295 points) [ no revision ]
recategorized Mar 29, 2014 by dimension10

1 Answer

+ 1 like - 0 dislike

We already have categories, don't we? 

This is what we have:;      

  • Main
    • Theoretical Physics
    • Phenomenology
    • Experimental Physics
    • Astronomy
    • Mathematics
    • SE.TP
    • SE.Imported
  • Refreeing
  • Meta
    • Community Moderation
    • Discussion
    • Support
    • Bug
    • SE.Imported
    • SE.TP.Meta
    • Chat
  • ViXrA

Or do you mean further categorisation? Wouldn't tags suffice? I suppose you mean categories like hep-th, etc., I'm  not so sure how much that is required, though, it would mostly be the same as the category for theoretical physics. Mostly.             

answered Feb 22, 2014 by dimension10 (1,950 points) [ no revision ]

The tags are flat, so that questions are generally inside a flat category. I meant a hierarchical system, where each question's spin-offs are linked to the question heirarchically, and all questions either have a root at an arxiv category, or even more specifically in an arxiv paper (which has it's own question). This is a tag system which can be threaded easily, and will allow people to only examine questions in their field of interest without having to set the tags. The current tags are not content-identical with arxiv categories, I think the arxiv categories are very good, they have experience, and they were decided by Ginsparg, after some thinking.

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysicsOve$\varnothing$flow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...