Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

Please welcome our new moderators!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

122 submissions , 103 unreviewed
3,497 questions , 1,172 unanswered
4,544 answers , 19,342 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
408 active unimported users
More ...

Journal club-like thing

+ 10 like - 0 dislike
27 views

I am thinking if it is good to ask a poll question like "Interesting preprints of Jan 2012". IMHO it may be fruitful (personally I think that I miss a lot of good preprints for various reasons).

Pros:

  • it's a natural extension of the idea of journal club upgraded to web2.0 (with all its benefits)

Cons:

  • is a poll question
  • the most interesting only for a number of months (?)

When it comes to details, I suggest the following:

  • Community Wiki by default
  • references should be followed by summary saying what is the result and (implicitly or explicitly) why it is important/interesting/insightful/...
    • simply copying&pasting abstract is not enough
    • critical remarks are welcome as well
  • no self-advertisement
  • timescale and topic scale are up to fine tuning

What is your opinion? (Both with respect to the general idea and its details).

EDIT:

As the meta-question got +6, I posted it as Papers and preprints worth reading, Jan-midFeb 2012.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
asked Feb 8, 2012 in SE.TP.discussion by Piotr Migdal (1,250 points) [ no revision ]

1 Answer

+ 1 like - 0 dislike

Probably most people in this website enjoy journal-clubbing, so why not?

Yet the post title "papers and preprints worth reading" sounds a bit aggressive to me. Maybe we could replace it with something more neutral, since it is impossible to cite all the papers "worth-reading" that appear in a month, not to forget that our posting-format is a bit biased since the first answers to this kind of posts tend to absorb more attention.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
answered Feb 25, 2012 by jbvega (285 points) [ no revision ]
If there is enough interest on doing the journal club regularly we could give it a personal name related to the site e.g. Journal Exchange Club or something alike.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
When it comes to name - I am more than open (yeah, maybe _papers and preprints worth reading_ isn't the best title but I have nothing better in my mind).

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysicsOve$\varnothing$flow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...