Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New features!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

123 submissions , 104 unreviewed
3,547 questions , 1,198 unanswered
4,552 answers , 19,366 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
411 active unimported users
More ...

Deletion of closed questions

+ 2 like - 0 dislike
944 views

I've just discovered that a question of mine that had been closed, was in fact deleted as well. It was called "Gell-Mann's 1983 theory of everything" and if you google that title, you can still see the evidence that it existed, though the text itself is no longer in the Google cache.

Mostly I'm just shocked that it's gone. I didn't even know the record could be erased in this fashion, though I now see that the FAQ mentions the possibility of deletion. I think I am also justifiably surprised that this question was seen to be bad enough to warrant deletion.

In that post, I pointed out no less than three features of Gell-Mann's 1983 construct which resembled subsequent experimental or theoretical developments, and asked for comment. In the first version of the question, I may have described those resemblances inadequately, but a subsequent explanatory edit did remove quite a few of the downvotes that the question originally obtained. Without going into the details again, I think I at least have the right to express my amazement that a question of such technical intricacy would be removed from the site. I would have thought that the intrinsic interest of the question's ingredients would have more than made up for any other negative features.

And of course, if some or all of it turns out to have been correct, it's also a bad outcome. Perhaps it's obvious that one should not rely on a Stack Exchange site to establish priority. But to see such a question, not just closed but deleted, certainly inclines me to curtail the nature of my participation here. I am geographically remote from the centers of theoretical physics research, and I might have hoped for more from this site than just answers to questions that could be resolved by a literature search anyway. But evidently it is not safe to express ideas here.

My meta questions are:

First, did anyone happen to save a copy of the deleted question?

Second, is there some way to warn new users, far more prominently than now, that what they write may just disappear one day?

edit: A day later I'm a lot calmer about this... Moshe mentions online "physics forums" as a place where open-ended discussion can occur. That may be so, but they aren't safe either. At one such forum, I recently had eight months of discussion wiped out by a moderator. My advice to anyone with "new ideas" who may read this, is that you should only post them on forums where you really do know they won't be deleted; or, you can start your own blog; or, if you can, you should write a paper about it.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
asked Dec 21, 2011 in SE.TP.discussion by Mitchell Porter (720 points) [ no revision ]
Or you can archive the webpages. I can understand outrage (however misplaced) about a question being deleted, but **you are responsible for your own data**. If you don't want to lose something, then the onus is on *you* to make a backup.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
I've just checked out the question. It seems it was closed as off-topic by Moshe, but no one is credited with deletion which occurred at 0:01, which makes me think it occurred as the result of some SE automated process. I'll email you the full text of the question.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
@Joe, thanks for doing that (emailing), should have thought about that myself.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)

2 Answers

+ 6 like - 0 dislike

Questions that are closed as "off topic" or "not constructive" stay on the site for a while to give a chance for the OP to rephrase and improve the question. If the question stays closed and unmodified for a while, it is usually deleted. I think this is routine on stack exchange sites (as described by the FAQ you link to). This is not to be taken as a judgement of their quality, only questions that are very low quality (e.g. spam) are deleted for that reason, and that usually happens much faster.

The question you are referring to was closed on October 27th as "not constructive". That was my decision (after receiving ample community feedback on the question) - as I recall there was no question there, just a long opening statement followed by a single sentence soliciting opinions. In addition, the topic in question was not related to current mainstream research. As we discussed at the time, chatty and open ended questions are not a good fit for stack exchange sites, and personal "theories of everything" are not a good fit for this specific site. This is nothing personal, there are very specific goals for this site and we are trying to concentrate on those. There are other sites (e.g. physics forums) which are much more welcoming to open ended discussions such as the one you initiated.

The question was subsequently deleted on December 3rd, I am not sure by whom. This is roughly five weeks later, plenty of opportunity to discover a way to improve on the question and make it a better fit for our stated goals.

Feedback is appreciated, positive or negative, on the habit of deleting dead questions after some time has passed. This is not our (the moderators) site, and I am acting in the manner I understand to be the wish of the community.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
answered Dec 21, 2011 by Moshe (2,375 points) [ no revision ]
Most voted comments show all comments
I have a question on MathOverflow from August that wasn't deleted, and if you search for closed questions on TCS.SE, there are lots of them that are quite old and haven't been deleted. Closed questions don't seem to be impeding the functioning of either of these sites. I don't see why there is such a hurry to delete them here.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
Thanks Peter, I'd like to hear from more users about the general question, and perhaps SE administrators as well, since I understood that to be SE policy. Just a couple quick comments in response to your comment: old but on-topic questions are not an issue, and I also feel that physics has specific challenges that don't exist in other sites (e.g. theories of everything). That said, your point is well-taken, thanks for your input.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
I certainly would not object to deleting certain questions about theories of everything. On the other hand, there only seem to be six closed but undeleted questions on TP.SE, which is much fewer than either TCS.SE or MathOverflow. Of course, those websites had a lot more questions to begin with.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
I looked at the stats, and roughly half of the closed questions got eventually deleted by the mods, and a few additional ones got deleted by the user. This includes migrated questions that get deleted immediately to avoid duplicating effort. The issue in my mind is what should be the default for closed questions that have been dead for quite some time - should I find reasons to delete them, or should I find reasons to keep them on the site?

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
My opinion is that you should keep them on the site unless there are good reasons to delete them. (Certainly migrated questions should be deleted, and I can think of a bunch of other good reasons to delete them as well.) I don't know what the StackExchange guidelines on this are.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
Most recent comments show all comments
@Joe: Going by the StackExchange FAQ, the script may do different things depending on the reasons the questions were closed, or it may look at the amount of activity the questions get.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
@PeterShor: Yes, perhaps that's it. In any case, this deletion doesn't appear to have been mod intervention.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
+ 2 like - 0 dislike

Maybe some very annoying or even trolling closed questions which are heavily downvoted by the community could be deleted a bit more efficiently (I mean the last series of four "not a real question" questions that appeared on the main page for example)...? Letting them float around encourages people with similar destructive intentions to upvote such posts again and to further spam this site ...

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
answered Jan 1, 2012 by Dilaton (4,175 points) [ no revision ]
I agree, moreover the main page simply doesn't look good with a sequence of such questions. This affects new visitors

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
Yes @Squark Your questions for example look much better, I always like them a lot :-)

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysicsOver$\varnothing$low
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...