Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New features!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

123 submissions , 104 unreviewed
3,547 questions , 1,198 unanswered
4,551 answers , 19,358 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
411 active unimported users
More ...

"Soft" questions

+ 9 like - 0 dislike
15 views

What is the atittude here concerning "soft" questions? I'm thinking of questions that are maybe not directly research level physics, but interesting to the community. For example, questions on career advice or how to deal with referees. On MathOverflow such questions regularly lead to discussions on whether it is appropriate or not.

Personally, I think such questions can be quite interesting and helpful, and probably this site will be more approriate than physics.SE. Then again, such questions tend can be argumentative or too much dependent on the individual (i.e., the asker is better off asking, say, a professor that (s)he knows).

Are such questions not welcome at all or is there place for decently stated questions?

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
asked Sep 17, 2011 in SE.TP.discussion by Pieter (550 points) [ no revision ]
Such questions were allowed with the tag [soft-question] on CSTheory, and I don't think it caused any major problems, since it is easy to filter out. I'm all for soft questions too, as long as they make up a relatively small fraction of the total site.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
related [blog post](http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/09/good-subjective-bad-subjective/)

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
I'm all for soft questions, as long as they are on-topic (like your examples). To be honest, I mostly find these types of questions the most interesting.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)

2 Answers

+ 5 like - 0 dislike

I think the de facto, if not de jure, policy on Math Overflow is to judge soft questions post factum, i.e. if a "borderline" question turns out to be popular, with good answers etc., leave it alone, otherwise take steps towards closing. This is a sound policy, IMHO. As long as soft/argumentative questions remain a small fraction of all questions, I see no problem with them.

Another type of questions are "advice/career", like How important is it for one on the job market to have thought about suitable REU projects?. These are more controversial, but I think we shouldn't ban them outright - it's better to keep an eye on them and if a question deviates too much from the usual Q&A format, close it. As a side note, appearance of such career questions shows that some kind of public forum for discussing academic and career matters seems to be in demand

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
answered Sep 18, 2011 by Marcin Kotowski (405 points) [ no revision ]
+ 4 like - 0 dislike

As I've stated in the comments, I'm a big fan of these. I was thinking about this meta today and decided to make a short list of (in my opinion) good examples of Soft-questions found on MO. I'm posting this as an answer merely to not open another thread.

The reason I want to post this List is because I am hoping that in the long run, there will be an aquivalent Physics version of this.

(Do note, these are very very soft)

I've actually learned alot from these 5 threads, even though one might assume they are meant as pure fun & games. For example, I didn't understand quite a few of the jokes, so I read up on the specific subject, got it, laughed and it stuck.

I understand however that this is a touchy subject. But judging from the meta-comments above, I think others here would like to see these some time down the road as well (Once there are enough users to actually populate these CW's).

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
answered Sep 18, 2011 by Michael Kissner (230 points) [ no revision ]

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysicsOve$\varnothing$flow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...