Is this really a problem? If I see a paper mentioned, SE provides reputation incentives to edit the post to provide links. This way a new user doesn't have to think about it, and will naturally notice the practice after some time participating.
I prefer DOI and arXiv of course. DOI because it's robust against change and arXiv because it's open. Perhaps some standard way of including both should be used when possible. I suggest including both because the DOI seen in arXiv abstracts is supplied by the authors. Some arXiv documents may be published, yet still lack a DOI on the abstract page.
Perhaps something along the lines of:
Andersson et al. [arXiv][DOI]
which is kinda fiddly or
Andersson et al. (arXiv)(DOI)
This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)