Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New features!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

123 submissions , 104 unreviewed
3,547 questions , 1,198 unanswered
4,551 answers , 19,358 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
411 active unimported users
More ...

What should the site look like, i.e. Site Design?

+ 4 like - 0 dislike
31 views

As scientists, we are often accused of being oblivious to aesthetics, yet the aesthetics of a website plays an important role in its draw to the community at large and its usability, as the other physics.se site found. There is a case for austerity in our design, both math.se and mathoverflow have very spare designs. I find them slightly painful to look at for long periods, but they work quite well with the subject matter. I think there are better examples with tex.se and stats.se, and still feature the spare, yet functional aesthetic. Regardless of what we decide, I do not want to end up retaining the beta site look.

Thoughts?

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
asked Sep 14, 2011 in SE.TP.discussion by rcollyer (240 points) [ no revision ]
@Dori, good point, I was using what was used on physics.se.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
I think it's fine to get the design discussion started early. I'd like to see more suggestions from the users of this community. Visually, what do you think separates this site from physics.se?

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
Are you abolutely sure that this is the very first question to ask here?

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)

1 Answer

+ 3 like - 0 dislike

The 5th question in The 7 Essential Meta Questions of Every Beta is to talk about the design of the site. However, this is much too early to talk about the site design.

A site receives a site design once it graduates from beta status. Our beta sites share the "sketchy" theme to indicate the beta feeling.

Focus on building your site first. There isn't even a single question on the main site! Your efforts should be focused there. You need a site with content in order to have a site to design!

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
answered Sep 14, 2011 by Rebecca Chernoff (0 points) [ no revision ]
My intent was to get started on those questions. Question number one, requires questions first. Q2 required more time than I had. Q3 is multi-faceted, and I have at least one concern I was planning on bringing up when I had the time. Q4, I didn't know where to start. Q5: I had a definite opinion on. You're right that content should be the primary focus, but this was easy to get out of the way.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysics$\varnothing$verflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...