Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

Please welcome our new moderators!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

122 submissions , 103 unreviewed
3,497 questions , 1,172 unanswered
4,543 answers , 19,337 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
407 active unimported users
More ...

Scaling solutions in context of Denef - Moore

+ 4 like - 0 dislike
6 views

My question is based on the paper Split states, entropy enigma, holes, halos.

What are the scaling solutions discussed on page 49 of the paper ?

It is stated that the equations ${\sum_{j, i\neq j}\frac{I_{ij}}{r_{ij}} = \theta_{i}}$ always have solutions os the form $r_{ij}= \lambda I_{ij}$. why is that true?

I don't understand this as some of the I's may be negative and then a single $\lambda$ can cannot give such a solutions as the distance will be negative in such cases.

I would greatly appreciate an answer explaining the proper meaning of such solutions and what are the conditions for their existence.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
asked Oct 16, 2011 in Theoretical Physics by J Verma (270 points) [ no revision ]
retagged Mar 24, 2014 by dimension10

1 Answer

+ 3 like - 0 dislike

$I_{13}$, $I_{32}$ and $I_{21}$ in eq. (3.56) are positive, as shown in the sentence below (3.57) and also in the caption of Fig. 6.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
answered Oct 17, 2011 by Yuji (1,390 points) [ no revision ]
Thanks for reply. Well I'm aware of prof. Moore's and also of other string theorist's mathematical acumen and that's one of the reasons why I read their papers. Sometimes, I get confused, and that's because of my ignorance and things I don't pay attention to. Thanks for pointing that out.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
Also, the discussions of scaling solutions in the paper by Denef-Moore did not satisfy everyone (including you). This led to a few related papers, e.g. http://arxiv.org/abs/0807.4556 . So, when you have a very specific question in a paper, you shouldn't just ask it here... You need to think about it yourself, and then write a paper about it.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
Yes indeed. But you need to understand that Prof. Moore is almost the most rigorous person as far as string theorists are concerned. You need to learn to relax and read what the authors meant behind what is in fact written. (Un)fortunately, string theory is not math.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
thanks for pointing this out. But in this case the solution should be $r_{13}, r_{21}, r_{32}= \lambda I's$ not $r_{ij}= \lambda I$ for all $i,j$. Also what will happen in the case when say $r_{21},r_{32} < 0$.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysicsOverfl$\varnothing$w
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...