Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

Please welcome our new moderators!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

122 submissions , 103 unreviewed
3,497 questions , 1,172 unanswered
4,543 answers , 19,337 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
407 active unimported users
More ...

Calculating correlation functions of exponentials of fields

+ 11 like - 0 dislike
17 views

In their book Condensed Matter Field Theory, Altland and Simons often use the following formula for calculating thermal expectation values of exponentials of a real field $\theta$:

$$ \langle e^{i(\theta(x,\tau)-\theta(0,0))} \rangle = e^{-\frac12 \langle (\theta(x,\tau)-\theta(0,0))^2 \rangle} $$

An example can be found in chapter 4.5, problem "Boson-fermion duality", part c). (This refers to the second edition of the book, page 185.)

In other words, expectation values of exponentials can be cast as exponentials of expectation values under certain conditions. Unfortunately, I seem to be unable to find an explanation of why this can be done and what the conditions on the Lagrangian of $\theta$ are.

Hence, my question is:

How to derive the above formula? What do we need to know about $\theta$ for it to be valid in the first place?

Ideally, I am looking for a derivation using the path integral formalism. (I managed to rederive a very special case in terms of operators and the Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff formula, but I'd like to gain a more thorough understanding.)

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
asked Oct 6, 2011 in Theoretical Physics by Greg Graviton (575 points) [ no revision ]

2 Answers

+ 15 like - 0 dislike

This is just a property of Gaussian averaging analogous to the finite dimensional case:

$\langle e^{ix} \rangle=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}\sigma}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{ix}e^{-\frac{x^2}{2\sigma^2}}=e^{-\frac{\sigma^2}{2}}= e^{-\frac{\langle x^2 \rangle}{2}}$

The field can be decomposed into its independent Gaussian modes and integrated for each mode separately.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
answered Oct 6, 2011 by David Bar Moshe (3,505 points) [ no revision ]
The simplest answers are simply the best.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
+ 4 like - 0 dislike

David Bar Moshe's derivation is of course right. Let me offer you a Taylor-expansion-based alternative proof: $$ \left\langle e^{ix} \right \rangle = \left\langle \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{(ix)^n}{n!} \right \rangle = \left\langle \sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac{(ix)^{2k}}{(2k)!} \right \rangle $$ Here, I just used that by some odd-ness, the odd powers have a vanishing expectation value. In the formula above, $x$ is whatever linear function of the elementary fields you want, including your coefficient. But the expectation value of $x^{2k}$ is $$ \left\langle x^{2k} \right \rangle = \frac{ \int_{-\infty}^\infty {\rm d}x \,x^{2k}\exp(-x^2/2x_0^2)}{ \int_{-\infty}^\infty {\rm d}x \,\exp(-x^2/2x_0^2)} = 1\times 3\times \cdots \times (2k-1) \times x_0^{2k} $$ which may be computed by integrating by parts or by converting it to the Euler integral (which is also evaluated by parts) so when you combine it with the $1/(2k)!$ factor, the odd integers cancel, only the product of the even integers which is equal to $2^k k!$ is left, and the original sum from the first line is $$\sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac{(-x_0^2)^k}{2^k k!} = \exp(-x_0^2/2) $$ where $x_0^2$ is the expectation value of $\langle x^2\rangle$ because I used it in the probabilistic distribution. Again, you may set $x=\theta(x_1,t_1)-\theta(x_2,t_2)$ or whatever linear function of variables and my derivation still holds.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
answered Oct 6, 2011 by Luboš Motl (10,178 points) [ no revision ]

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\varnothing$ysicsOverflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...